ENG101 NeoBank Case: How to Structure Your ELSI Analysis
ENG101 Assessment 3, the Final Analytical Portfolio, asks you to judge NeoBank's use of AI, blockchain, IoT, AR/VR, quantum computing, human augmentation and green tech through the ELSI lens: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.
A simple way to keep your analysis sharp is one formula per issue:
Issue → Evidence → NeoBank impact → Mitigation
- Ethical: bias in automated credit scoring. Mitigate with bias audits and human review of declined loans.
- Legal: biometric data counts as sensitive information under Australian privacy law. Mitigate with explicit consent and non-biometric login options.
- Social: customers who are older, rural or low-income may be excluded by app-only services. Mitigate with assisted channels.
For the 8-minute video, spend the most time (about 2.5 minutes) on ELSI, and keep your language plain for a non-technical audience.
Our full guide covers the video timeline, an 1,800-word report plan and a technology-to-ELSI table: ENG101 Assessment 3 NeoBank guide. For more IT and ethics support, see computer and IT assignment help.
Comments
Post a Comment